State v. Ortiz-Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing lower court finding of a de facto taking even though the business owner had “established that potential customers of petitioner’s used car lot-related businesses no longer stop and patronize petitioner and/or are, by the detour, being funneled to petitioner’s competitor.”
• 1.3 mile detour required by barrier was not so circuitous as to be a substantial or unreasonable interference with access
• 1.3 mile detour required by barrier was not so circuitous as to be a substantial or unreasonable interference with access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).