Utah Supreme Court· 12/6/1985
State v. Ortiz
Citations
- 712 P.2d 218
- 1985 Utah LEXIS 981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a court abused its discretion when it refused to allow a defendant to substitute a new alibi witness for a disclosed one who had become unavailable immediately prior to trial
- noting that section 77-14-2(3) “grants a trial court discretion to exclude evidence if the ten-day notice requirement is not met”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Honie v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2014-05-30· cited 76×
- State v. FultonUtah Supreme Court· 1987-05-28· cited 73×
- State v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-12-08· cited 13×
- State v. TuinmanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2023-08-03· cited 13×
- In re D.A.T.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2021-07-01
- State v. GillingCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2025-08-21
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.