Skip to main content

State v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7400

Syllabus

Motion to withdraw guilty plea hybrid representation ineffective assistance of counsel court costs and fines. The court did not err in denying defendant's pro se oral motion to withdraw guilty plea prior to sentencing, because defendant was represented by counsel at the time and defendant failed to offer a reasonable and legitimate basis for withdrawing his plea. Case remanded for nunc pro tunc to correct the sentencing journal entry to reflect the sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing regarding court costs and fines.

Judges: Blackmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.