State v. Ortiz
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7400
Syllabus
Motion to withdraw guilty plea hybrid representation ineffective assistance of counsel court costs and fines. The court did not err in denying defendant's pro se oral motion to withdraw guilty plea prior to sentencing, because defendant was represented by counsel at the time and defendant failed to offer a reasonable and legitimate basis for withdrawing his plea. Case remanded for nunc pro tunc to correct the sentencing journal entry to reflect the sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing regarding court costs and fines.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 384×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
- State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 239×
- State v. JalowiecOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-04· cited 133×
- State v. WestleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-09· cited 29×
- State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-15· cited 4×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-09· cited 2×
- State v. McClellandOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-15· cited 2×
- State v. LarsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.