Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/23/2005
State v. Ortiz
Citations
- 124 P.3d 611
- 202 Or. App. 695
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the phrase “statutory counterpart” found in ORS 813.010(5) (felony DUII
- relying on other statutes promulgated as part of the same bill as context when construing a statute
- considering other provisions of the “same mammoth” legislation that produced the statute at issue
- discussing such a situation in relation to ORS 813.010(5)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarltonOregon Supreme Court· 2017-02-09· cited 19×
- State v. RawleighCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 8×
- Dyrdahl v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-08· cited 7×
- Nulph v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 7×
- State v. JacobCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 5×
- Proctor v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 3×
- Warrenton Fiber Co. v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 2×
- Farmer's Direct, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court· 2021-02-03· cited 2×
- Martini v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services (DMV)Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-11· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.