State v. Ortiz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An appellate court will not entertain a successive motion for postconviction relief unless the motion affirmatively shows on its face that the basis relied upon for relief was not available at the time the movant filed the prior motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harris
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2004-04-09· cited 185×
• State v. Marshall
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2005-01-07· cited 106×
• State v. Sims
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-12-22· cited 102×
• State v. Amaya
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-12-05· cited 98×
• State v. Barnes
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 60×
• State v. Moore
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 45×
• State v. Marshall
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2007-01-12· cited 42×
• State v. Wagner
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-10· cited 41×
• Lotter v. Houston
  D. Nebraska· 2011-04-25· cited 25×
• State v. Lotter
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2022-07-01· cited 21×
• Akins v. Kenney
  D. Nebraska· 2008-02-07
• State v. Hessler
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-07-25
• DeJong v. Nebraska
  D. Nebraska· 2017-02-09
• State v. Anthony
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2023-01-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Reeves
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-01-07· cited 68×
• State v. Ryan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-09-10· cited 61×
• State v. Curtright
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-01-04· cited 44×
• State v. Ortiz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1971-12-03· cited 9×
• State v. Dandridge
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-10-04· cited 5×
• State v. Narcisse
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 4×