State v. Ortega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the mere potential for 4 destruction of evidence does not give rise to an exigency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gomez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
• State v. Lopez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 74×
• State v. Boyse
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-06-10· cited 62×
• State v. TYWAYNE H.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
• State v. Weidner
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-04-12· cited 44×
• State v. Vargas
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-12-20· cited 27×
• State v. Moore
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-03-19· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Souza
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-02-04· cited 17×
• State v. Vargas
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-09· cited 13×
• State v. Gonzales
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-12-21· cited 10×
• State v. Vargas
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ker v. California
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
• People v. Maddox
  California Supreme Court· 1956-02-28· cited 303×
• State v. Attaway
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
• State v. Cordova
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 110×
• State v. Martinez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 53×
• State v. Sanchez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-08· cited 33×
• State v. Ortega
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-04-30· cited 8×