State v. Ordonio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[ejvidence which is simply information recorded by a medical examiner, unenhanced by any additional medical comment by that examiner, does not constitute ‘competent medical evidence’ ”
• “Evidence which is simply information recorded by a medical examiner, unenhanced by any additional medical comment by that examiner, does not constitute ‘competent medical evidence.’”
• mere repetition of a medical assertion from another source by a medical professional does not amount to a competent medical opinion
• evidence recorded by a medical examiner, unenhanced by any medical comment, does not constitute competent medical evidence
• transcriptions of lay history unenhanced by any medical comment by examiner not transformed into “competent medical evidence” merely because transcriber happens to be medical professional
• the mere transcription of medical history does not transform the information into competent medical evidence merely because the transcriber happens to be a medical professional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).