· 11/13/1998
State v. Opupele
Citations
- 967 P.2d 265
- 88 Haw. 433
- 1998 Haw. LEXIS 417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s failure to object at trial constituted waiver of issue on appeal
- vacating and remanding conviction because trial court failed to make any findings as to whether the confidential informant was a necessary witness
- calling a \mere proximity\ instruction \superfluous\ to an instruction on constructive possession
- calling a “mere proximity” instruction “superfluous” to an instruction on consti’uctive possession
- “The correctness of [the foregoing definition], as a general definition of possession, is not in dispute.”
- “The correctness of [the foregoing definition], as a general definition of possession, is not in dispute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.