State v. Onque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a warrantless entry into a home may be valid if warranted by exigent circumstances, such as hot pursuit of an armed felon . . . [or t]he potential destruction of evidence”
• \Neither the State nor the 10 A-3600-13T2 court is bound by a stipulation of a matter of law which is contrary to controlling law on the subject.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).