Connecticut Appellate Court· 1/12/1993
State v. Ong
Citations
- 30 Conn. App. 45
- 618 A.2d 583
- 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he defendant’s brief makes it clear that he deliberately chose not to file a transcript of the trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SpillaneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-04-24· cited 33×
- State v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-06· cited 18×
- Geren v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-12-06· cited 15×
- State v. RobinsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-08· cited 13×
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-03-23· cited 10×
- Edwards v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-01· cited 4×
- State v. OngSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-24
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 125×
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-09· cited 73×
- Pineda-Velasquez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 21×
- State v. AnthonyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-02-22· cited 19×
- State v. SteinmannConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-01-30· cited 15×
- State v. WeisserConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-12-09· cited 14×
- State v. BusterConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-04-07· cited 9×
- State v. BaezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-11-20· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.