State v. O'Neil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he evidence * * * was conspicuously insufficient to establish a legal justification for the killing on the ground of self-defense * * *. The defendant’s testimony clearly discloses that he was the active aggressor * * *.”
• \[T]he evidence * * * was conspicuously insufficient to establish a legal justification for the killing on the ground of self-defense * * *. The defendant's testimony clearly discloses that he was the active aggressor * * *.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Oregon v. Nodine
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-07-08· cited 66×
• Pueblo v. Sutton
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1911-03-31· cited 24×
• State v. Corrivau
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-07-22· cited 13×
• Hauwiller v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-08· cited 8×
• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-13· cited 7×
• People v. Sutton
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1911-03-31

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-01-02· cited 16×