Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/26/2006
State v. Olmstead
Citations
- 213 Ariz. 534
- 145 P.3d 631
- 489 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5
- 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the trial court has discretion to impose a presumptive sentence even if it finds only mitigating, and no aggravating, factors
- “[E]ven when only mitigating factors are found, the presumptive term remains the presumptive term unless the court, in its discretion, determines that the amount and nature of the mitigating circumstances justifies a lesser term.”
- upholding a presumptive sentence where no aggravating factors were found
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker, Kessler, Snow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court· 1974-02-28· cited 54×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-03· cited 50×
- State v. CazaresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-07-11· cited 31×
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-08-19· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-14· cited 20×
- State v. WillcoxsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-17· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.