Supreme Court of Iowa· 12/23/1998

State v. Oliver

Citations

588 N.W.2d 412
1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 294
1998 WL 896856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that imposition of consecutive sentences without explanation of reasons was not sufficient under rule 2.23(3)(d)
stating that State’s intimation that a plea agreement existed was, in the absence of further proof, without merit
holding purpose of enrollment fee is “ ‘to offset costs of supervision,’ ” not to punish the defendant (quoting Iowa Code section 905.14(1))
vacating sentence and remanding for resentencing where court failed to state reasons for nonmandatory sentence
rejecting the State’s argument “that because the consecutive sentence provision would only take effect if the defendant violated the terms of probation, the court was not required to give any reasons for choosing such a sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Megiverin, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.