State v. O'HARA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that attempted first-degree assault and second-degree assault did not merge under ORS 161.067(1)
• conviction for attempted first-degree assault “does not require [the] defendant to have caused serious injury, only that he have intended to cause such injury” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Crews
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-23· cited 28×
• State v. Marks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-18· cited 5×
• State v. Tyler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 3×
• Dorn-Privett v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-28· cited 3×
• Gill v. Lampert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-05· cited 2×
• United States v. Crews
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-03-03· cited 2×
• United States v. Crews
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 1×
• State v. Cazarez-Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sumerlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-20· cited 44×
• State v. Gilbertson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 4×
• State v. O'Hara
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-08-02· cited 4×