State v. Oghojafor
Citations
- 205 N.E.3d 687
- 2023 Ohio 44
Syllabus
Defendant appeals kidnapping and domestic violence convictions. Batson challenge. Defendant failed to establish that the state violated his constitutional rights in exercising a peremptory challenge on a black juror. State had race-neutral basis for excusing juror. Limiting instruction. Defendant testified concerning his own character. State then questioned defendant concerning a specific accusation of domestic violence. Defendant argued court by failing to instruct jurors concerning the accusation. No plain error where the state's inquiry was proper under Evid.R. 405(A)(1). Counsel not ineffective for not having requested \safe-place-unharmed\ instruction under R.C. 2905.01(C)(1). Defendant's defense theory inconsistent with safe-place-unharmed instruction.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing whether a PIN number for a food stamp program is an “authentication feature” under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(11)(A)(ii)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.