State v. O'Donnell
Citations
- 116 Kan. 182
- 225 P. 1078
- 1924 Kan. LEXIS 43
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Labor on Sunday — Information Charges in Separate Counts — Not Necessary to Allege That Defendant Was Not Within Statutory Exceptions. In an information charging in separate counts violations of sections 3661 and 3664 of the General Statutes of 1915, it is not necessary to allege that the defendant did not come within the exceptions named in sections 3662 and 3665.</p> <p>2. Same — Information Not Bad for Duplicity. An information, drawn under section 3664 of the General Statutes of 1915, charging that the defendant kept his groceiy store open for business on Sunday and did expose divers goods, wares, and merchandise for sale on that day, is not bad for duplicity.</p> <p>3. Same — Keeping Store Open for Sale of Certain Goods Not Prohibited by Statute. Keeping a store open on Sunday for the sale of drugs, medicines, provisions, and other articles of immediate necessity or exposing them for sale is not prohibited by section 3664 of the General Statutes of 1915.</p>
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BuisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1910-10-08· cited 21×
- State v. Belle Springs Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1910-11-05· cited 12×
- State v. PerelloSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-03-09· cited 10×
- City of Kansas City v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-02-10· cited 9×
- State v. WeldySupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-06-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.