State v. Odom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence that the defendant “applied chemicals to Su- dafed” and gave “instructions to further the manufacturing pro- cess” was sufficient to sustain a conviction for attempted manufac- ture of methamphetamine
• “In moving for a judgment of acquittal, a defendant admits not only the facts stated in the evidence, but also every reasonable conclusion favorable to the State that the fact-finder might fairly infer from the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sims
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-25· cited 8×
• United States v. Christopher E. Miles
  Eleventh Circuit· 2023-07-31· cited 5×
• Odom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-21· cited 3×
• Fonseca v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-17· cited 3×
• Darius L. Grayson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-24· cited 1×
• MICHAEL BARTOLONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-05-26
• MICHAEL BARTOLONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-10-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27· cited 17×
• J.A.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-31· cited 9×
• Ball v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-26· cited 7×
• Bufford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-16· cited 6×
• Armbruster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-25· cited 5×