Skip to main content
· 5/25/1984

State v. Odenbrett

Citations

  • 349 N.W.2d 265
  • 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Child Abuse Reporting Act works to preempt the privilege
  • “We decline, therefore, to address this [due-process claim] when it was neither adequately raised nor considered below, and where, apparently because it was not raised below, the record inadequately presents the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.