State v. O'connor, 02-0684 (2003)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court should have excluded testimony that was “simply too speculative and highly prejudicial”
• admission of evidence of plaintiff's alcohol consumption was reversible error where his blood alcohol level was below the legal intoxication threshold and there was no evidence that plaintiff appeared intoxicated at the time of the accident
• admission of evidence of plaintiff’s alcohol consumption was reversible error where his blood alcohol level was below the legal intoxication threshold and there was no evidence that plaintiff appeared intoxicated at the time of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).