Skip to main content

State v. O'CONNELL

Citations

  • 726 S.W.2d 742
  • 1987 Mo. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a defendant was sufficiently notified because a term stated in the charging document had a statutory definition providing the additional elements, although the charging document did not allege them
  • Police locate and inventory property that the defendant had earlier reported stolen; inventory search serves the same governmental interests as in impound ment or arrest cases.
  • both requiring allegation of reliance in charge of stealing by means of deceit
  • Missouri requires a separate conviction and sentence for each offense charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.