Skip to main content
· 10/21/1968

State v. Obstein

Citations

  • 247 A.2d 5
  • 52 N.J. 516
  • 1968 N.J. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering both the need for offense-specific information and the fairness of making the same information available to both the defense and prosecution
  • when defendant seeks to present psychiatric evidence at trial, defendant must “cooperate fully” with state’s examining expert “unless, of course, he is unable to do so because of a mental condition”
  • exemplifying “the New Jersey rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.