Skip to main content

State v. O'Brien

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1173

Syllabus

Trial court loses jurisdiction to act once an appeal has been taken and decided, unless the action pertains to an issue that is not inconsistent with the jurisdiction of the appellate court to review, affirm, modify, or reverse the appealed judgment. Crim.R. 32.1 motion is inconsistent with the appellate court's jurisdiction to affirm the conviction premised upon that plea. The trial court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to consider a Crim.R. 32.1 motion after the conviction has been affirmed on appeal.

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.