State v. Ober

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we have “consistently held that the results of polygraph tests are not admissible as evidence of guilt or innocence in criminal trials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lee v. Martinez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-07-14· cited 58×
• In re Grimm
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-17· cited 56×
• State of New Hampshire v. Theadore Mitchell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-05-16· cited 8×
• Appeal of Waterman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-11-30· cited 5×
• State of New Hampshire v. Nestor Roman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2023-12-28

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ruelke
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-11-30· cited 52×
• State v. LaForest
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1965-02-26· cited 25×
• State v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-09-30· cited 12×
• State v. French
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-06-27· cited 8×