State v. Oatney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Arguments that urge the jury to draw legitimate inferences based on admissible evidence are generally acceptable; con- versely, arguments that go beyond the admissible evidence generally are not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Burton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2025-06-24· cited 4×
• State v. Kyei
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-23· cited 3×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• United States v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 647×
• Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-06-01· cited 125×
• State v. Sperou
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 120×
• State v. Pitt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
• State v. Soriano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-13· cited 53×
• State v. Jarnagin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-04-26· cited 50×
• State v. Oatney
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 42×
• State v. Black
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-04-04· cited 39×
• State v. Miranda
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 35×
• United States v. Slough
  D.C. Circuit· 2011-04-22· cited 34×
• Cler v. Providence Health System-Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 33×
• State v. Jackson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-17· cited 31×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-08-16· cited 26×
• State v. Bartol
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-10-07· cited 20×
• United States v. Allen
  Second Circuit· 2017-07-19· cited 19×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-08-01· cited 16×
• State v. Apodaca
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-11· cited 10×
• Oatney v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 3×