State v. Oakley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s challenge to a burden-shifting statute, contained in a pretrial motion, was not ripe “because prior to actual application of the alleged burden-shifting statute at trial, there can be no constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Mendez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-25· cited 9×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Cauley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-08-22· cited 4×