State v. Nunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court was “free to resentence . . . so long as the newly imposed sentences were authorized by law and did not exceed the original . . . sentence”
• stating that the district court was “free to resentence . . . so long as the newly imposed sentences were authorized by law and did not exceed the original . . . sentence”
• stating that, on remand, the district court was “free to resentence . . . so long as the newly imposed sentences were authorized by law and did not exceed the original . . . sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-07-03· cited 6×
• State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-10-20· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Norregaard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 30×
• State v. Rieck
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-30· cited 29×
• State v. Pickett
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-11-02· cited 14×
• State v. Rohda
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-11-02· cited 10×
• State v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 6×
• State v. Hatton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-08-14· cited 5×
• State v. Nunn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-01-13· cited 2×