District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/14/1996
State v. Nuckolls
Citations
- 677 So. 2d 12
- 1996 WL 324661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \[t]he issues in this case revolve around the legal sufficiency of the pleadings and therefore we review de novo the trial court's ruling\
- statewide prosecutor tracked the language of section 16.56(1)(a) and such language fulfilled the jurisdictional requirements for the statewide prosecutor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dauksch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
- Winter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-27· cited 18×
- Snyder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-14· cited 6×
- Amos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-27· cited 5×
- Small v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-02· cited 1×
- Macool v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-27· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.