Skip to main content
· 2/14/2000

State v. N.U.

Citations

  • 99 Wash. App. 1033
  • 2000 Wash. App. LEXIS 2794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining the four factors used to determine if new trial is warranted in Rule 412 violation claim and concluding that, if any error was present, it was harmless
  • “failure to comply with discovery requirements does not, in all instances, necessitate a new trial [citation], and each case must be examined to determine whether the State’s failure resulted in harmless error [citation]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.