State v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]ven though the subject matter may be appropriate for voir dire interrogation, the manner of asking, the phrasing of the question, may render it improper.”
• “[Q]uestions related only to the sexual offenses and the jury found the defendant not guilty of those crimes. Obviously, he suffered no injury . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Antwine
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-12-15· cited 533×
• Pollard v. Whitener
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-02-10· cited 41×
• State v. Jenkins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-11-03· cited 15×
• State v. White
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-12-02· cited 12×
• State v. Twitty
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-06-26· cited 12×
• Blunkall v. Heavy & Specialized Haulers, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-03-25· cited 12×
• State v. Muhammad
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-07-19· cited 9×
• State v. Morris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-02-06· cited 9×
• State v. Perkins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-04-08· cited 8×
• State v. Martin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-09-11· cited 6×
• State v. Knowles
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-10· cited 6×
• Mays v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-10-23· cited 4×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent v. SCOTT A. REMSTER
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Kenol Celian
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-02-25
• State of Missouri v. Justin A. Fields
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-05-11
• Williams v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-26