Washington Supreme Court· 2/21/2002
State v. Norman
Citations
- 145 Wash. 2d 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendants apprehended north of the 49th parallel, yet south of the Canadian border, were subject to criminal jurisdiction in Washington
- holding that defendants apprehended riorth of the 49th parallel, yet south of the Canadian border, were subject to criminal jurisdiction in Washington
- dispute over the plain language of the state constitution in light of advancing technology
- dispute over the plain language of the state constitution in light of advancing technology
- “Generally, proof that the crime was committed in the state satisfies the jurisdictional element.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen, Sanders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 686×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 682×
- State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 114×
- York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 72×
- York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 68×
- State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-06· cited 47×
- State v. PeralaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-16· cited 18×
- Pruczinski v. AshbyWashington Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 16×
- Ledgerwood v. LansdowneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-09· cited 14×
- State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-06-14· cited 12×
- State v. KarpovWashington Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 4×
- Norman v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2002-10-07
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court· 1952-09-02· cited 99×
- New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 83×
- State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court· 1963-04-11· cited 81×
- Malyon v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 80×
- State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. SlavinWashington Supreme Court· 1969-03-20· cited 71×
- United States v. WyomingSupreme Court· 1947-06-02· cited 57×
- In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 54×
- State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1965-03-04· cited 53×
- Anderson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court· 1975-12-04· cited 47×
- Washington v. OregonSupreme Court· 1908-11-16· cited 39×
- State v. SquallyWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 36×
- Minnesota v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1920-03-08· cited 30×
- Central R. Co. of NJ v. Jersey CitySupreme Court· 1908-04-27· cited 28×
- Texas v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 26×
- Bloomer v. ToddWashington Territory· 1888-08-14· cited 25×
- Vermont v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 20×
- Illinois v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 19×
- Mount Spokane Skiing Corp. v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-07· cited 19×
- State v. SvensonWashington Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 19×
- Brown v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court· 1912-08-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.