Skip to main content

State v. Norman

Citations

  • 145 Wash. 2d 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendants apprehended north of the 49th parallel, yet south of the Canadian border, were subject to criminal jurisdiction in Washington
  • holding that defendants apprehended riorth of the 49th parallel, yet south of the Canadian border, were subject to criminal jurisdiction in Washington
  • dispute over the plain language of the state constitution in light of advancing technology
  • dispute over the plain language of the state constitution in light of advancing technology
  • “Generally, proof that the crime was committed in the state satisfies the jurisdictional element.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.