State v. Norman
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5070
Syllabus
COMPETENCY — RESTORATION — INVOLUNTARY-MEDICATION ORDER — MOOTNESS: Defendant's appeal of the trial court's involuntary-medication order is moot where defendant has been restored to competency, and the involuntary-medication order has expired. The exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable as defendant cannot show that the expired involuntary-medication order is capable of repetition yet evading review where defendant has maintained her competency over the course of six months pending her trial, and any subsequent concerns of incompetency require a new competency assessment and hearing.
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 1,489×
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1,055×
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 734×
- State ex rel. White v. Kilbane KochOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-02· cited 60×
- State v. BairdOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-30· cited 7×
- State v. WadlingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-04· cited 6×
- In re R.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-21· cited 5×
- State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-23· cited 2×
- State v. PotterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-25· cited 2×
- State v. T.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.