Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/4/2011

State v. Noe

Citations

256 P.3d 166
242 Or. App. 530
256 P.3d 14
2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 646
2011 WL 1662356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that guilty verdicts on PSV and UUV counts merge when the counts are based on the same conduct or criminal episode
recognizing that UUV requires proof of a “knowing” mental state, while possession of a stolen vehicle “requires only that defendant commit the theft ‘ha[ving] reason to believe that’ the vehicle was stolen”
holding that \convictions for conduct in a criminal episode that violates two or more statutory provisions merge if all of the elements in one provision are subsumed into the elements of the other provision\
“[Unauthorized use of a vehicle] requires proof of an element that [possession of a stolen vehicle] does not have: knowledge.”
guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle merges with guilty verdict for unauthorized use of a vehicle
guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle merges with guilty verdict for unauthorized use of a vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.