State v. Noble
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2128
Syllabus
The record does not support appellant's claim that his pleas were not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Rather, the record fully supports the trial court's determination that appellant made a rational decision to accept the State's plea offer despite his protestations of innocence. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant cannot rely upon speculative, hindsight criticisms of the plea agreement to establish deficient performance by counsel. Furthermore, in light of the substantial sentencing benefit obtained through the plea agreement, appellant cannot credibly assert that he would have rejected the agreement and proceeded to trial. The trial court's sentencing decision was supported by the record and was not contrary to law.
Judges: Siebert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1979-11-14· cited 195×
- State v. PiacellaOhio Supreme Court· 1971-07-07· cited 128×
- State v. ArledgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 12×
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-10· cited 10×
- State v. GableOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-29· cited 9×
- State v. SatterwhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-23· cited 7×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-03· cited 4×
- State v. Heiser-MullinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-12· cited 2×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.