State v. Nobach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court was “not persuaded that lay people are sufficiently knowledgeable about ... the effects of drug consumption ... to offer lay opinion testimony on [the] subjectf], based on personal observations, under Rule [11 — ]701”
• “we are not persuaded that lay people are sufficiently knowledgeable about common symptoms of drug consumption ... to offer lay opinion testimony”
• with a lay opinion testimony rule that directly tracks the language of Rule 701
• with a lay opinion testimony rule that directly tracks the language of Rule 701

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).