State v. Nixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Retrospective operation is not favored by the Courts, and a law will not be construed as retroactive unless the Act clearly, by express language or necessary implication, indicates that the legislature intended a retroactive application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ismaaeel
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2004-01-13· cited 19×
• Judkins v. Judkins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1952-10-16· cited 15×
• State v. Bender
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1971-10-20· cited 4×
• State of Delaware v. Jennings.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-08-11
• State of Delaware v. Coverdale.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-08-11
• State of Delaware v. Priest.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-10-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ainscow v. Alexander
  Delaware Orphan's Court· 1944-08-22· cited 27×
• State v. Nixon
  New York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1945-10-29· cited 6×