Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/14/2012
State v. Nims
Citations
- 274 P.3d 235
- 248 Or. App. 708
- 2012 WL 839306
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant's argument that the unavoidable lull rule was overruled in Rodgers/Kirkeby
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-15· cited 82×
- State v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-16· cited 8×
- State v. BlackstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-20· cited 7×
- State v. Zin Min AungCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 3×
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-08-14· cited 2×
- State v. UrigCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-04· cited 1×
- State v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-27· cited 1×
- State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
- State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 55×
- State v. HuggettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27· cited 14×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-20· cited 11×
- State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.