State v. Niles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of evidence of complainant’s prior sexual conduct because it “did not make it more probable that she was motivated to fabricate, or that she was biased against defendant.”
• consensual sex with other persons in private was properly excluded at rape trial where consent was an issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-30· cited 24×
• Keene v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-06-29· cited 9×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-02· cited 8×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 7×
• United States v. Kelly
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1991-10-30· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. LeClair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 55×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-05· cited 33×
• State v. Wattenbarger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-05· cited 14×
• State v. Reiter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-09· cited 8×
• State v. Bender
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-08· cited 4×