State v. Nieto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidentiary rulings are addressed to the discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-12· cited 5×
• CID TORREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-22
• Iroh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-18
• Cardona v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-29
• Alloggia v. Paradise Rentals 1, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-01
• Burgess Transportation, Inc. v. Arostegui
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Saccoccia
  First Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 281×
• United States v. Daccarett
  Second Circuit· 1993-09-10· cited 177×
• Stano v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 65×
• State v. Hickson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-21· cited 42×
• Bozeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-01· cited 30×
• Marrero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-15· cited 23×
• La Villarena, Inc. v. Acosta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-07· cited 14×
• Jenks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-13· cited 10×