State v. Niedergang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court’s finding of fact that defendant’s automobile was parked outside curtilage of his house was at least mixed question of law and fact because “curtilage” could be determined only by examining facts of case
• stating that conclusions of law are \determination[s] ... made by a process of legal reasoning from facts in evidence.\
• stating that conclusions of law are “determination [s]... made by a process of legal reasoning from facts in evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).