State v. Nickoson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exercise of admiralty jurisdiction \does not result in automatic displacement of state law.\
• holding that the exercise of admiralty jurisdiction “does not result in automatic displacement of state law”
• holding that the exercise of admiralty jurisdiction “does not result in automatic displacement of state law.”
• holding that \a ship or its appurtenances must proximately cause an injury on shore\ to fall within admiralty jurisdiction
• holding that a barge that was intermittently used as a work platform was still a “vessel” since it was also occasionally “used for transportation.”
• holding that navigation of boats in navigable waters is “closely related to activity traditionally subject to admiralty law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).