State v. Nickerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no justification or special need existed for appropriating funds to establish a vocational-technical school in only one county
• no justification or special need existed for appropriating funds to establish a vocational-technical school in only one county

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cox v. Director of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-03-04· cited 74×
• Chinnery v. Director of Revenue
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-10-25· cited 30×
• State v. Cross
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-11-14· cited 15×
• Gallas v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2007-09-27· cited 15×
• Wilson v. Weiss
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-12-14· cited 14×
• State v. Elam
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-10-10· cited 12×
• State v. Hollis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-10-29· cited 11×
• Hampton v. Director of Revenue
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-12-27· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Kansas City v. Troutner
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-29· cited 40×
• State v. O'Toole
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-07-17· cited 29×
• State v. Taylor
  Montana Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 26×
• State v. Hoeber
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 21×
• Taylor v. McNeill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 19×
• State v. Davison
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-03-22· cited 15×
• State v. Parr
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-08-02· cited 4×