State v. Nichols
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4596
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's post-sentence motion requesting jail-time credit for the time appellant spent on electronically-monitored house arrest while on bond. It is well established that electronic monitoring as a condition of bond does not constitute \confinement\ for purposes of receiving jail-time credit under R.C. 2967.191. In addition, the issue raised in appellant's post-sentence motion was barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-03· cited 56×
- State v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-01· cited 17×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10· cited 15×
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-19· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-12· cited 4×
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-28· cited 2×
- State v. BoscarinoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.