Skip to main content

State v. New

Citations

  • 536 N.W.2d 714
  • 1995 S.D. LEXIS 109
  • 1995 WL 499742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that by strategically placing a “witness’[s] credibility into question through cross-examination which presented inconsistencies in [the witness’s] testimony . . . the defendant ‘opened the door’” for the State to introduce previously excluded testimony
  • holding that testimony of another who was acquitted of the same offense for which the defendant was on trial was admissible because strategy of the defendant “opened the door” to the acquittal evidence and “failed to show actual prejudice” as a result
  • acquittal admitted after “references made by New’s attorney in opening statement that White Horse was involved in Mousseaux’s death.”
  • acquittal admitted after \references made by New's attorney in opening statement that White Horse was involved in Mousseaux's death.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amundson, Miller, Konenkamp, Sabers, Gilbertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.