State v. Nevels
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 915
Syllabus
Guilty plea Alford plea protestations of innocence Crim.R. 11 knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily factual basis. Defendant-appellant's statement that he pleads guilty but he is not guilty is a protestation of innocence sufficient to invoke the trial court's duty to further inquire into the factual basis surrounding the charges to determine whether defendant-appellant is making a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. Where the trial court failed to so inquire, defendant-appellant's guilty plea was not made knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1979-11-14· cited 195×
- State v. RembertOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-30· cited 11×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 7×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-29· cited 6×
- State v. WilkersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-11· cited 4×
- State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.