State v. Netto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the facial vagueness challenge and stating that the statute used “ordinary terms to express ideas which find adequate usage and understanding. The use of common experience as a glossary is necessary to meet the practical demands of legislation.”
• “The statute should be given a construction that will not render its terms useless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).