Skip to main content
· 1/23/1990

State v. Nesius

Citations

  • 548 N.E.2d 1201
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 37
  • 1990 WL 4831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We do not believe the trial court erred by refusing to allow the State to supply—after the fact—a possible justification for the investigative stop not contemplated by the police officer at the time of the stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Conover, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.