Utah Supreme Court· 7/25/1989
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 777 P.2d 479
- 113 Utah Adv. Rep. 29
- 1989 Utah LEXIS 79
- 1989 WL 81801
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- residual exception applies where the hearsay statement’s “admission is justified by the inherent reliability of the statement” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 61×
- State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-03-05· cited 37×
- State v. MatsamasUtah Supreme Court· 1991-03-06· cited 29×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-10· cited 20×
- State v. MarbleCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-03-15· cited 13×
- State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court· 2015-09-04· cited 12×
- State v. Phong NguyenUtah Supreme Court· 2012-12-04· cited 10×
- Scott v. HK CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-10-23· cited 4×
- State v. ButtarsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2020-06-04· cited 3×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-04-25· cited 2×
- ND v. AbCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-06-26
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-01-06
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.