State v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the particularity requirement prevents searches and seizures at a location not intended by the search warrant, thus safeguarding the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Polakoff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-08· cited 4×
• Ingraham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-08· cited 3×
• State v. Gayle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-24· cited 2×
• MERRIEL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-13· cited 1×
• Russ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1924-03-18· cited 40×
• Carlton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-03-08· cited 36×
• Shedd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-04· cited 13×
• Pezzella v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-04· cited 9×
• Harden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-13· cited 7×
• State v. Riley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-12-13· cited 6×
• State v. Henderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-10-11· cited 6×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-19· cited 4×
• State v. Brooker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-25· cited 3×
• State v. Gaunt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-19· cited 1×