State v. Nelsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the government may solicit testimony from a police officer who had viewed a surveillance video before it was re-recorded and erased
• noting that application of Evidence Rule 1004 is fact-sensitive and government had not been alerted by defendant’s objection that it needed to further develop the record on videotape’s admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).