State v. Neis
Citations
- 74 Wash. 280
- 133 P. 444
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2037
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — -Review—Exceptions. Error in instructions can be reviewed on appeal only when exceptions thereto were brought to the attention of the trial court before disposing of a motion for a new trial, and it is not enough that exceptions were served and filed in the cause.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Trial—Appeal—Harmless Error. The defendant cannot predicate error upon improper conduct of the court in that, on sustaining objections to examination by defendant’s counsel, a remark was made suggestive of improper relations of the defendant, when it was not any more so than the objectionable questions.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court· 1912-12-30· cited 38×
- Coffey v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-06-03· cited 16×
- White v. RatliffWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-30· cited 8×
- Gerber v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-12-12· cited 7×
- State v. NeisWashington Supreme Court· 1912-06-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.